Prestigious science journal Nature offered what some might consider a surprising perspective on TransCanada’s Keystone XL pipeline. In their recent editorial “Change For Good”, the respected journal urged government officials to approve the controversial pipeline citing that Alberta’s oil sands aren’t as “dirty” as many people believe.
« Impacting the environment: it’s a human thing | Main | Idle No More: First Nations leader Roberta Jamieson weighs in »
February 8, 2013
Comments
Oil Sands Question and Response (OSQAR) is a blog created by Suncor Energy to support constructive dialogue about the oil sands. In our weekly posts, we talk about the energy industry, environmental impact, tailings management and reclamation, water management and the social and economic implications of oil sands development.
Our oil sands operations are near Fort McMurray, Alberta, where we recover bitumen from oil sands through mining and in situ operations. The bitumen from both operations is then upgraded to refinery-ready feedstock and diesel fuel. More about the where and the what of the oil sands can be found on our oil sands resource page.
Subscribe to OSQAR
Sign up to receive the OSQAR Email Newsletter. You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the "Unsubcribe" link in any OSQAR email you will receive.
Or you can subscribe to OSQAR via the RSS feed.
Connect with Suncor
There are countless advantages we all share because of how energy is used. And there are challenges we all want addressed. See what Yes can do and be part of the conversation.
Popular Posts
- Celebrity-powered: Oil sands spokespeople we’d like to see
- Dutch Disease revisited – two recent perspectives on oil sands development in Canada
- Fort McMurray: 5 things you should know
- Fort McMurray: A story in photos
- Oil sands growth: solving worker shortages
- Oil sands: Will growth continue?
- Rex Murphy on Canada’s oil sands
- Suncor’s top five myths: busted!
- Tailings ponds: What they’re made of
- Unburnable carbon: A perspective from Michal Moore
Recent Posts
- Where’s OSQAR?
- New task force addresses transparency
- Reclamation project is fen-tastic
- Take our 2015 survey
- Canadian leaders discuss climate change
- Partnering with Aboriginal businesses: Looking beyond the oil sands
- How to curb Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions
- A vote to divest: Now what?
- Doing more with less
- Rebuilding trust, one click at a time
Recent Comments
- Ed Ma on Energy’s war of words
- Chris Powter on Energy’s war of words
- Katrina Dunkley on Sustainability opportunities for Canadian businesses: A perspective from Tima Bansal
- Peter MacConnachie on Divestment: Dispatches from the frontline
- Jim O'Reilly on Divestment: Dispatches from the frontline
- Peter MacConnachie on Pursuit of green continues, despite threat of red
- Jim O'Reilly on Pursuit of green continues, despite threat of red
- Aaron Lingnau on Is refining oil too crude a business?
- The OSQAR Team on Biggest issues for the energy industry in 2015: Three perspectives
- Peter on Energy: thinking outside the black box
Categories
- Aboriginal Relations
- Air Quality
- Athabasca River
- Bitumen
- Boreal Forest
- Canadian Economy
- Carbon Emissions
- Carbon Reduction
- Climate Change
- Cost of Energy
- Crude Oil
- Energy Choices
- Energy Consumption
- Energy Economics
- Energy Efficiency
- Energy Infrastructure
- Environment
- Environmental Barriers
- Environmental Footprint
- Fort McKay First Nation
- Greenhouse Gas
- Guest Post
- In Situ
- Oil Demand
- Oil Sands Boycott
- Oil Sands Education
- Production Efficiency
- Reclamation
- Renewable Energy
- Social Impact
- Sustainability
- Tailing Ponds
- Water Management
Other Suncor Blogs
