Amongst the noise and fury of claim
and counter-claim, hyperbolic media rhetoric and fact-less, ad hominem arguments
taking place as part of the North American energy debate, environmental organizations
and oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania recently did something rather
unusual, and almost beautiful.
Photo Credit: iStockphoto
They agreed to stop shouting at each
other and instead, collaborate on a path forward for safely and responsibly developing
the Appalachian Basin’s abundant shale
gas resources.
Performance
standards
The group created and funded the Center
for Sustainable Shale Development (CSSD) and announced 15 initial performance standards for
unconventional exploration and development in the region, including the highly
controversial practice of hydraulic fracturing or ‘fracking’.
The standards, which address the protection of air,
water quality and climate, will form the foundation of the CSSD’s independent,
third‐party
certification process for operators and drill sites. What is particularly significant
is CSSD founding parties are neither fringe groups nor minor players.
Environmental,
industry heavyweights involved
Environmental
Defense Fund is one
of America’s top three environmental non-governmental organizations (ENGOs),
while Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future (PennFuture) is that state’s most
influential environmental campaign group. Other ENGOs involved include Clean
Air Task Force, Pennsylvania
Environmental Council and GASP (Group Against Smog and Pollution).
Industry too is represented by
heavyweights: Chevron
and Shell need no introduction, while CONSOL
Energy and EQT Corporation are established gas producers in the Appalachian Basin,
which extends from New York State to Alabama. They’re joined by two major
philanthropic foundations, Heinz Endowments and William Penn Foundation, along
with former U.S. Environmental Protection Agency head Christine Todd Whitman,
former Secretary of the Treasury Paul O’Neill and the President of Carnegie
Mellon University as CSSD board directors.
CSSD is not something that has been hastily
cobbled together to try to temper growing public hostility to gas drilling. It
is the result of two years of discussions where participants with diverse
perspectives worked to establish a shared vision of performance and
environmental risk minimization for natural gas development in the region.
The aim is that CSSD standards govern
all operators and that the organization continuously raises the bar as
technology and science progresses.
Finding
common ground
CSSD proves companies and organizations
with a range of opinions can find common ground even on something as
contentious as shale gas.
There is an opportunity to collaborate in the oil sands, and here too, there is a precedent. The
Canadian Boreal Initiative, for example, brings together diverse
partners to develop solutions for conserving the Canada’s boreal forest, parts
of which are in the oil sands region.
Another example is Canada’s Oil Sands
Innovation Alliance, which was created to bring industry together and further
involve government, academia and the public in improving environmental
performance in the oil sands. It’s a good start but there is ample opportunity
to go further.
Meanwhile, congratulations to CSSD and
the shale gas industry. As an oil sands operator, we’re inspired by your achievement
as we continue to pursue common ground for the safe and responsible development
of Canada’s oil sands resource.
Recent Comments